Layout Image

Archive for Deidre Knight

Can You Hear the People Sing?

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

I’m hearing the Carpenters as I start this blog. “Longgggg ago…and oh so far away.” (I guess that has a Star Wars ring to it, but it’s Karen Carpenter I’m hearing.) I’ve been around the publishing block quite a few times now. This summ

er I begin my seventeenth year in the “biz.” When I started out, there were rumblings about digital books being the future, and as early as 1998 or so, I began retaining e-rights for clients when possible. Everyone knew digital would be the wave of the future. A point came, though, when it all seemed like a great deal of discussion and hype about a nonexistent trend. That changed somewhere shortly thereafter, as small presses began to emerge. I sold my first e-book to Hard Shell Word Factory in 2000. It even came out on diskette!

Time progressed, and lo, I resumed writing, which I’d quit when I began agenting (Come on, this is a long passage of time in my life, I can only summarize so briefly.) I set out to write the fabled “book of my heart”, BUTTERFLY TATTOO. I spent a year and a half crafting this novel, pouring my soul, some tears, and many hours of work into it. Then one spring day I was in NYC and I happened to discuss the book with an executive editor at Broadway Books. She was a “big gun.” I pitched my novel pseudonymously, so the editor had no idea it was actually by me (crafty, I know.) I’ll never forget her turning to me and saying with the deadly point-blank range of a .45: “You will NEVER sell this book. It won’t sell. Not in America.”

That was my last meeting of the trip, and I slumped in the cab all the way to LaGuardia. What had I done? I’d spent 18 months crafting a novel that nobody was going to buy! I was supposed to know better. I was an agent, an

industry professional, a marketing wunderkind. I’d screwed up royally on my own behalf.

Flash forward again. Twenty-seven rejections later, I became convinced the Executive Editrix was right: nobody was going to buy BUTTERFLY TATTOO. That is, until the digital market opened up yet even more, and I was able to offer it to Samhain. What happened with the advent of that opportunity was transcendent. Not just for Deidre the author, but Deidre the agent as well: NO, no

longer had to mean no. The digital frontier, that wide open terrain without borders, was a place where projects that I loved and adored but couldn’t place in NYC would find a home–could find a home. So long as a smaller publisher would buy them.

Roll forward a few more years. Self-publishing revolution occurs. Imagine a moment like the Berlin Wall coming down, at least in terms of how it felt to many authors—which is also not to belittle or demean the true significance of that political event. But it’s a good image. If digital publishing at large was a wide rolling plain of opportunity, then I do believe that self-publishing on Kindle, BN, Apple and so forth was the removal of a Berlin-style wall. Access was granted to all. At the airport last week, a baggage handler asked me, “Is publishing hard to break into?” My reply: “Not anymore.” He smiled, thinking, and said, “That’s good. It’s good that there’s not one big clique that only certain people can enter.”

I agree. I’m a huge believer in free enterprise on every level. In this new digital age, we’re in a time of incredible equalizing. There is no limited pie and everyone can take a slice. Talent can rise to the top, great ideas need not vault past committees and marketing teams in order to make it to the masses. An author may choose to work with, or without, an agent. It all depends on a writer’s working style and their goals—they may want someone to help craft a full portfolio of options (some self-pub, some traditional pub.) They might desire an agent to help them facilitate their self-publishing or might prefer to go that route on their own. But it’s a time when all the borders have been brought down.

For me as an agent, this is incredibly liberating. Back in 1996 when I began, I’d have to ask myself, “Do I legitimately think I can sell this book?” And that wasn’t all bad because, frankly, books were quite a bit easier to sell back then. If you found an awesome book on, say, single dating, you didn’t have to worry endlessly about the mammoth size of the author’s platform. In the past few years, prior to the digital revolution, I’d been forced to ask myself tougher and tougher questions: has this author been on the Today Show? Are they in national magazines? Do they have a sizeable platform?

This past fall, however, I signed on an amazing memoir—a Wall Street tell-all that had an incredible voice. Was super timely. Made me laugh aloud, over and over. I knew it might not sell because the author couldn’t blog or do interviews because of his job. I also knew that if it DIDN’T sell, I had other outlets. That, among other things, we could help this author self publish. I wasn’t locked in to just one avenue or route, we had multiple possibilities for bringing his fine memoir to the public’s attention. Ah. Breathing. I could sit back and do my job, which, in the end is this: To find quality, engaging, wonderful authors and spotlight them to readers.

In a few weeks, I’ll be excited for TKA to help Marley Gibson self-publish her YA, POSER. This book is a favorite of mine. It’s actually the work I signed her on for, and although we shopped it to a number of houses, it proved a tough sell. Editors worried about a YA featuring a teen model (I’m sorry, why?) So the amazing news? Thanks to the digital landscape, now Marley can take this fine book and make it available to readers. We can use our marketing “machine” (oooh, that sounds impersonal. Sorry, Jia) to support the title in many different ways. But ultimately, it’s like the BUTTERFLY TATTOO moment that I experienced. “No”—for me as an agent and an author—no longer has to mean no. This is incredibly liberating. I think it’s a great era for everyone who loves books and authors and writing.

Footprints in Shifting Sand

Tuesday, May 22nd, 2012

 

Here’s a reminder that is always worth repeating: there’s no erase feature for the Internet. Sorry. Just doesn’t work that way. Your interactions, blogs, tweets, Facebook updates and so forth all leave an indelible footprint on the Net

. “No problem,” you say, “I’m not searching for a job or a boyfriend.” Really? You’re not looking to engage a readership, now or in the future? Or if you’re reading this blog, you’re not in the market for an agent?

If you’re convinced that what you say on the web doesn’t matter, consider the following. You’re all fired up about a hot topic, like, oh whether agents shouldn’t be allowed to travel abroad. Even if you’re fully convicted on this front (and you might be right, if my accidental trip to Canada a few years ago is any indication), you could say something that you’ll regret having written once that agent visits www.BadSenseofDirection.com. Especially once she recognizes herself in your not so thinly-veiled remarks.

I’m being hyperbolic here (although I really did wind up in Canada by mistake—all the GPS lady’s fault!), but all humor aside, we’re in a time when people feel at liberty to say just about whatever they want on the web, and ultimately writing is your profession. It’s a business. So while today you may feel riled up about a topic, ask yourself if it’s really worth leaving that indelible mark of yours out on the web.

Likewise, I don’t recommend unfollowing people when you’re mad, either. That’s a really popular form of protest in Netland these days, and I can speak from experience and say I’ve been embarrassed within thirty seconds when I fell prey to this temptation.

The instantaneous nature of tweeting can be a siren song to angry outbursts or to furious unfollowings, which are the path to doom. In the past year, I was considering an author’s work, and was truly enjoying tweeting with her. She was all guns-aglory when she thought I was going to work with her. Then the minute—literally—that I passed on her work, she

unfollowed me. Here’s what is a bit foolish about that: I would have welcomed any other submission. And she probably thought I would never notice the unfollow, except I did. I knew she unfollowed me in a moment of sulk, and that made an impression on me. How would this same author handle revisions she didn’t like, or my asking her to change a book title? Probably with an outburst.

Likewise, if you’re frequently tweeting about politics or other incendiary topics, you should stop and ask yourself: “Am I going to lose potential readers?” Whether you live in a blue state or red, you’re likely surrounded largely by people who share your views because that’s how culture works. But the truth is that your readership is going to come from all walks, and you should consider whether it’s worth potentially alienating half your readership (since our country is an almost even split in terms of politics). I realize that my opinion on this isn’t popular with everyone. A friend and client of mine observed that some of her favorite authors were super vocal about what they believed in. My comment back was that it was fine because she agreed with those authors. But what if she did not? Basically, I think a lot of readers prefer to believe that an author shares their outlook, so to discover otherwise can be disillusioning—no matter what the beliefs in question might be.

If canadian pharmacy you really feel the need to engage on provocative topics—let’s face it, many folks enjoy a healthy debate and discussion—then perhaps it’s best to start a separate Twitter account where you can go crazy with your polemics. Or post anonymously on blogs so you can have all the tirade fun you want. Either way, if you’re more careful with how you participate on the Net, you’re less likely to alienate readers, agents, editors or any other professional associate. Now, go start a flame war all about me. I’m in my fire-retardant pajamas.

 

Comments (26)

Thrum Me, Baby, One More Time

Monday, May 14th, 2012

I’m currently reading a novel by an author who is always an auto-buy for me. I have probably purchased some twenty novels by this writer and I think she’s capable of basically blinking and producing fairy dust. So before I get started, don’t get me

wrong. Love. This. Author.

That said, as I was reading along last night in bed, darling husband beside me beneath the fluffy covers, I pointed to my Nook. “See, this is what I mean,” I said. “The entire state of editorial is getting sloppy.” He’d been reading a book, too, and had already—thirty minutes earlier—pointed to the misuse of Gallic instead of Gaelic in his own novel. I think we all know that there are fewer people editing more books at the big publishers. And with self-published books, due diligence in details can be overlooked occasionally. But that’s not what this blog is about. It’s about how important it is for a writer to watch their own backs, because in the end, authors are responsible for what they put out. It’s their baby, no matter who publishes it.

In the case of my auto-buy author, I explained to my husband what was frustrating me: multiple characters were using the same dialogue pattern. Let’s say I, Deidre Knight, am prone to saying, “Well, aren’t I a monkey’s banana?” If I’m a fictional character, I should be the only person using that phrase. If some other character also says, “Well, aren’t I a monkey’s banana?” or “Well, aren’t I a doggie’s biscuit?” then it creates a disruption for the reader. We the people no

longer buy into the author’s world if every character or numerous characters are using the same phraseology pattern. Even worse, we no longer buy the characters. It shatters the illusion we’ve stepped into.

The same problem occurs if an author is fond of tagging his manuscript with a particular favorite word. I used to be really attached to the verb “thrum”. His body thrummed with energy. My manuscript thrummed with a preponderance of thrumming. A friend would give me “thrumming alerts” when she read over my manuscripts, pulling back my overusage until finally I weaned myself off that word. But let’s use another example. Say, how many times do you think or use “trifecta”? If you do, what are the chances that your co-worker does as well? Or, say, “hoary”? My brainiac husband might look out on a winter’s morning and say, “Look, doll, there’s a hoary frost!” But I doubt anyone else within a ten mile radius would do the same. So just because the author is fond of a more poetic word does not mean that three characters in the same fictional world would be. That’s the distinction: is it a word that the author is imposing or a word that naturally spills forth from character?

Word repetition (called an “echo” by copy editors) is something that generally causes a disconnect for readers. It’s not just sloppy–it’s jarring after a while. What do I mean by an echo, you ask? If you use any word several time or more in a short few pages, say, vampiric. “His vampiric bride wasn’t sure how to bed and handle her vampiric husband’s needs.” But the repeated usage need not be so close together. In the case of a fairly unique word such as “vampiric”, if it appears even five or six times in a few short pages, that would be too heavy-handed.

Beware, too, the word that you the writer tend to use as filler. I discovered that I was prone to some variation of “just” and started search/replace every time I finished a book. Especially if I was writing in first person, present tense, for some reason, I “justed” all over the place: “He was just a man, nothing more.” “It was just a Monday, the least exciting day of the week.” (Bland examples, but you get the point, I’m sure.) I believe there are computer software programs that will even analyze your manuscript for phraseology and key words that tend to repeat too much. But the best cure, even if it’s the old-fashioned one, is to do what I do: read aloud. You’ll hear the nuances and problems that your mind’s eye naturally corrects when you only read on the page.

Editing is a vital part of the process, and it starts and ends with the author themselves. Even if you think your eyes cheap viagra online might bleed, read over your material just one more time—read it aloud to your husband or best friend. And it’s especially good to give it that final go-thru after you’ve stepped away from it for a few weeks.

Comments (36)
Categories : writing